Ohne den Masterplan, der eine nachhaltige Entwicklung des Tals in Bezug auf Verkehr, Lärmbelastung, Bevölkerungsentwicklung und die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung aufzeigen muss, darf die Mittelrheinbrücke nicht weiter geplant und erst recht nicht gebaut werden.
Die UNESCO erinnert daran, dass die Mittelrheinbrücke für die nachhaltige Entwicklung (wirklich) notwendig sein muss.
Auf Deutsch: Der UNESCO Beschluss zum Mittelrheintal 2011 »
93. Upper Middle Rhine Valley (Germany) (C 1066)
Decision: 35 COM 7B.93
The World Heritage Committee,
- Having examined Document WHC-11/35.COM/7B,
- Recalling Decision 34 COM 7B.87 adopted at its 34th session (Brasilia, 2010),
- Welcomes the information provided by the State Party on the progress towards the development of a Master Plan for the property that will set out how its Outstanding Universal Value will be sustained, and how the property might develop in a sustainable way in relation to traffic, noise pollution and demographic and economic developments;
- Notes the details provided by the State Party for taking forward the spatial planning procedures for the bridge;
- Recalls the need for any bridge development to be part of the overall sustainable development of the property;
- Requests the State Party to finalize and submit to the World Heritage Centre for review the Master Plan before finalizing details of a bridge project in order that traffic and transport development are embedded in the overall sustainable approach to the property;
- Also requests the State Party to submit to the World Heritage Centre, by 1 February 2013, an updated report on the state of conservation of the property and the implementation of the above, for examination by the World Heritage Committee at its 37th session in 2013.
Decisions report WHC-11/35.COM/20, p. 127-128. Paris, 7 July 2011
